Hutcheson (1725)
Originally uploaded by rob helpychalk.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Proud Member of the Reality Based Community. "Big Monkey, Helpy Chalk" --Caroline Helpy-Chalk, when she was 18 months.
Joey Pics; Caroline Pics
Rob Pics; Molly Pics
Edie Pics
The North Country Academy for the Excruciatingly Fine Arts
-
Note: The picture send you to Amazon, and if you buy something I get a cut.
Past Themes
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(61)
-
▼
March
(17)
- THIS SHEET CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION!
- This is my anteater eating ants. (Ant by Molly.)
- this is daddy turning into an airplane
- dear dd i hp u hada good tim et clas
- Do all fictions occur in fictional worlds?
- It is good that all the couples are together on th...
- Yeah, I'm just not seeing it.
- Another cite for the claim that it is difficult to...
- from the Miscellany section of Characteristics
- lets try this quote.
- Shaftesbury's notion of aesthetic disinterestedness
- means-ends rationality, desire, and non-cognitive ...
- ok, I'm writing again
- I'm writing, I'm writing
- Buddhist non-attachment and aesthetic disintereste...
- Moral Complexity in the Buffyverse
- Unicorn Anatomie
-
▼
March
(17)
5 comments:
frfly? No.
While I concur that a pentagon is more beauteous than a square, the equilateral triangle is foxy.
Yeah, I have a hard time taking this ferioufly.
It ſeems to me that in our time, the ſquare is aſſociated with a ſort of utilitarian (not in the ethical ſenſe) banality and lack of aeſthetic appeal. It ſeems induſtrial and functional. Like, if a Hexagon were a Rollſ-Royce, and a triangle were a Ferrari, a ſquare would be a Ford F-150.
Yeah, if anything I think the triangle iſ more attractive, more ſleek and glamorouſ than the ſquare.
Post a Comment