It ſeems to me that in our time, the ſquare is aſſociated with a ſort of utilitarian (not in the ethical ſenſe) banality and lack of aeſthetic appeal. It ſeems induſtrial and functional. Like, if a Hexagon were a Rollſ-Royce, and a triangle were a Ferrari, a ſquare would be a Ford F-150.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletefrfly? No.
ReplyDeleteWhile I concur that a pentagon is more beauteous than a square, the equilateral triangle is foxy.
Yeah, I have a hard time taking this ferioufly.
ReplyDeleteIt ſeems to me that in our time, the ſquare is aſſociated with a ſort of utilitarian (not in the ethical ſenſe) banality and lack of aeſthetic appeal. It ſeems induſtrial and functional. Like, if a Hexagon were a Rollſ-Royce, and a triangle were a Ferrari, a ſquare would be a Ford F-150.
ReplyDeleteYeah, if anything I think the triangle iſ more attractive, more ſleek and glamorouſ than the ſquare.
ReplyDelete